About Us
Services & Training
News & Updates
Calendar
Links
Our Disclaimer
Contact Us

Are Employers Still Responsible for Home Safety?
(last updated February 2000)

In the first week of Y2K, OSHA issued an opinion letter stating that companies who allow employees to work at home are responsible for federal health and safety violations that occur at the home work site. Per the opinion letter, this obligation would cover all work done at home, even the parent who has to dash out of the office to be with a sick child and finishes a memo at home. The letter also stated that employers have an obligation to inspect home work sites. OSHA stated that this was not a new rule, but merely a declaration of existing policy.

Within two days, the opinion had created so much controversy that U.S. Labor Secretary Alexis Herman withdrew the interpretation letter. This withdrawal of the letter does not, however, change OSHA’s view of employer responsibilities. Moreover, Cal-OSHA has long held the same standards with respect to the home work site.

The Labor Secretary indicated that the controversy has raised important questions about what protections Americans who work at home can expect from the government. She said she will convene a conference of business and labor leaders and set up an interagency task force to conduct a wide-ranging study of the issue. According to Herman, “Employers are responsible for employee safety and health, but we don't know what that means and how that applies to these new work arrangements in the home today.”

While hastily withdrawing its opinion letter, OSHA officials insisted that the withdrawal did not constitute a change in government policy and that the agency would take no new action. Neither OSHA nor Cal-OSHA has ever conducted government inspections of home offices. However, since the authority of both state and federal workplace safety law extends to every work site, no matter where the employee toils, the ostensible authority of the government to conduct home office inspections exists.

The real result of the OSHA letter and its withdrawal is to raise the issue of how workplace safety rules apply in the home and to assure employees that the government will not drop in for an inspection. However, employers still could be held liable if they know or should reasonably have known about home workplace hazards and fail to correct them. This would include everything from computers that overload home electrical circuits, to rickety stairs leading to a basement office, to ergonomic safety issues.

Telecommuting is a rapidly growing practice, with estimates of over 20 million Americans working at home. Although employers have long understood that they are responsible for safety whenever and wherever an employee is working, the letter has ignited a fierce debate that is likely to have a chilling effect on the willingness of many employers to allow telecommuting. However, since most telecommuting arrangements are reserved for a company’s most trusted employees, with careful planning, such arrangements should still be successful.

Strategy: It is suggested that companies should train people to set up safe home offices and limit the areas that will be considered the employee’s “work space.” Employers should also periodically inspect at-home workers' quarters, and obtain the employee’s permission to do so when establishing the home work site arrangement.

This article is a general overview of the subject matter at the date that it was last updated, and is not meant to provide professional opinions regarding any specific case, matter, or set of facts, or to substitute for the professional advice of Waag and Co. Instead, please contact Susan S. Waag, Esq. for additional information.
 


Top | Home | About Us | Services | News | Calendar | Links | Disclaimer| Contact Us

WAAG AND CO. • Phone (805) 783-2300 • Toll Free (888) 650-WAAG • Fax (805) 544-4215
P.O. Box 5060, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 • info@waagandco.com