About Us
Services & Training
News & Updates
Calendar
Links
Our Disclaimer
Contact Us

(December 2004)
Major Changes in Meal / Rest Break Regulations

Applies to

All Non-Government Employers

Effective Date

If approved, they are slated to become effective on December 20, 2004. Afterward, new, final regulations on the issue will be promulgated.

Synopsis

On December 10, 2004, the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (“DLSE”), filed emergency regulations that will provide workers more flexibility in taking meal and rest periods and clarify penalty assessments paid to workers by noncompliant employers. The Office of Administrative Law has ten days in which to review the filed regulations.

Finding of Emergency: Wages or Penalty?

Until now, the DLSE had enforced a staff opinion letter that deemed the “one-hour of pay” (required as an award to the employee for the employer's failure to abide by the law) to be “wages,” rather than a “penalty.” However, in its “Finding of Emergency” filed in support of the emergency regulations, the DLSE stated that the history of Labor Code section 226.7 clearly indicates that the payment was meant to be a penalty. As a penalty, the payment is subject to a one-year statute of limitations. This means that employees can only go back one year for unpaid missed-break penalties, rather than three years for “unpaid wages.” The DLSE is expected to look at whether this new interpretation will apply to claims that are currently pending at the DLSE. Since the only basis for previously declaring the payment to be wages was a staff opinion letter, and the Finding of Emergency is relying on a several-year-old statute, the “penalty” interpretation seems to be declaratory of existing law and should apply to currently pending cases

Income Tax Withholding Issues

One wrinkle to the “penalty” issue, however, is that, as a “penalty,” such payments are not subject to income tax withholding as they would be if they were deemed to be wages. This will create some new complexities in processing payroll where an employee has any missed breaks. Waag and Co. spoke with the DLSE’s regulatory office in San Francisco regarding this difficulty and they note that this is an issue that they will need to work out with the IRS. Accordingly, it is not yet clear how the tax-withholding issue will be resolved. Employers should contact their tax advisors for further guidance until and unless the DLSE is able to provide better information.

Meal Period Start Limits

The second area of law clarified by the emergency regulations relates to the time parameters in which meal periods can be taken. In prior opinion letters, DLSE staff interpreted the Labor Code and the Wage Orders to require an employer to start the employee 30-minute meal period before the end of the fifth hour after the start of the workday. This interpretation has resulted in the imposition of penalties on employers even in cases where the employee's meal period was scheduled to begin, for example, five minutes after the fifth hour of the workday.
As a result, employers often force employees to take meal periods within those constraints, even when the employee has no desire to stop work in order to eat or rest at such specific times. This was due to the DLSE’s literal application of the language contained in the Wage Orders, without reference to the statutory intent. The Finding of Emergency notes that Labor Code sections 512(a) and (b) gave the Agency the specific authority to address meal periods that begin after the sixth hour, but not for meal periods occurring prior to the sixth hour. Therefore, common sense dictates that the DLSE has the authority to interpret the provisions dealing with meal periods that occur between the beginning and the sixth hour of the workday.

So, under the emergency regulations, an employee who wants to take a meal period still should start it by the end of the fifth hour worked; however, there would now be a “grace period” of a one-hour window for the employee to clock out for lunch. Employers need to understand that this is only a “grace period” relating to the five-hour mark; in other words, if somebody wants their meal break but cannot get off-duty until six hours and one minute into their shift, that employee has missed their break and must be paid a penalty.

The emergency regulations also state that an employer will be deemed to have provided a meal period to an employee in accordance with the Labor Code Section 512 if the employer does the following: Makes the meal period available to the employee and affords the employee the opportunity to take it; posts the applicable Wage Order; and maintains accurate time records for covered employees, as required by the posted Wage Order. The result of this is that if an employer makes timely meal periods available, but the employee simply does not want to stop for lunch (and this must be solely the employee’s choice with no pressure by the employer), then the employer would not be liable for the missed-break penalty when that employee decides not to take a timely meal break.

Meal Period Recommendations

Waag and Co. recommends that, once the new rules go into effect, employers inform employees in writing of the circumstances under which they are entitled to a meal period and have them acknowledge in writing that they understand those rights.

Conclusion

If approved, these regulations would go into effect on December 20, 2004. Waag and Co. will continue to monitor this situation as it develops and provide information as it becomes available.

This material is a general overview of the subject matter, and is not meant to provide professional opinions regarding any specific case, matter, or set of facts, or to substitute for the professional advice of Waag and Co. Instead, please contact Susan S. Waag, Esq. for additional information. Use of this information is allowed, provided that credit is given to: Susan S. Waag, attorney; Waag and Co.; September 2001 Employer Bulletin; INFO@WaagandCo.com; (805) 783-2300

You can download the current and past Bulletins in PDF (Portable Document File) format where proceeded by below. All other Bulletins are in standard HTML format. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is required to open, view, and print the bulletins, you can download the application FREE from the link below.
December 2004: Government Rescinds Emergency Meal Regulation Changes
December 2004: Major Changes in Meal / Rest Break Regulations
August 2004: California’s Infamous “Bounty Hunter” Law Reformed
June 2002: Workers' Comp. Relief for Employers
April 2002: Supreme Court Favors Employers in FMLA Ruling
April 2002: Salary Basis Issue Finally Resolved
November 2001: New California Legislation (update)
November 2001: (2 Court Cases) What is Harassment?
October 2001: New Drug & Alcohol Testing Rules
October 2001: Tax Legislation: New Pension Laws
October 2001: Employers Must Explain Family Leave
March 2001: Rest and Meal Periods II
March 2001: Salary Basis Test Changes to Monthly
January 2001: AB 2509 (Wage & Hour Law)
December 2000: Rest and Meal Periods
Dec. 2000: New Calif. IWC Wage Order 16
Dec. 2000: New OSHA Ergonomics Standards
Nov. 2000: New Workplace Investigations Course
November 2000: Calif. Minimum Wage Increase
March 2000: AB60 Update
August 1999: Sick Pay Law
August 1999: Cal Poly Class and GMS
August 1999: Age Discrimination Law
November 1998: Susan Waag CCPA
November 1998: FEHA Liability Reduction
November 1998: Disability Discrimination
November 1998: COBRA
November 1998: CHP Drug Testing
July 1998: Sexual Harassment


Top | Home | About Us | Services | News | Calendar | Links | Disclaimer| Contact Us

WAAG AND CO. • Phone (805) 783-2300 • Toll Free (888) 650-WAAG • Fax (805) 544-4215
P.O. Box 5060, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 • info@waagandco.com