About Us
Services & Training
News & Updates
Calendar
Links
Our Disclaimer
Contact Us

(October 2001)
Employers Must Explain Family Leave
Applies to
All employers with 50 or more employees
Effective Date
Immediately
Synopsis
Employers must notify employees about the method they use to calculate the 12-month period during which employees can take federal family leave.
Discussion
The Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued a ruling regarding the federal Family & Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) in the case of Bachelder v. America West Airlines. The Court held that employees who are not clearly notified about the calculation method can choose whichever method gives them the most family leave time.

Under the FMLA, eligible employees are entitled to 12 workweeks of leave during any 12-month period for their own illnesses, to care for family members who are ill, or to care for a newly born or adopted child. The U.S. Department of Labor’s FMLA regulations permit employers to choose one of the following methods to determine the 12-month leave period:

  1. The calendar year;
  2. Any other fixed 12-month “leave year,” such as a fiscal year, or a year based on an employee’s “anniversary” date;
  3. The 12-month period measured forward from the date an employee’s first FMLA leave begins; or,
  4. A “rolling” 12-month period measured backward from the date an employee uses any FMLA leave.

In the Bachel case, the employer did not clearly define which method would be used for determining the 12-month leave period. In January, an employee who had taken a lengthy FMLA leave during the middle of the preceding calendar year asked for additional FMLA leave. The denied the request, noting that it had been less than 12 months since the employee used up her FMLA leave, and that she had no more FMLA time available. The employee argued that because the employer did not identify a method for measuring the 12-month leave year, she could pick whatever method was most favorable to her. Accordingly, she chose the calendar year method, which resulted in the full 12 weeks of FMLA time being available. The Ninth Circuit agreed with the employee.

What does this mean?

Employers should review their FMLA policies to make sure it is very clear which of the four methods is used to calculate FMLA leave. If your policy is vague, choose a calculation method, revise your policy to clearly identify it, and distribute the new policy to all employees. The calculation method you choose will become effective 60 days after you notify employees. Until then, the method that is most beneficial to each particular employee will apply. The transition to the new policy must also take place in such a way that the employees retain the full benefit of 12 weeks of leave under whichever method gives the greatest benefit to the employee, particularly if you currently have any employees out on FMLA leave.

This material is a general overview of the subject matter, and is not meant to provide professional opinions regarding any specific case, matter, or set of facts, or to substitute for the professional advice of Waag and Co. Instead, please contact Susan S. Waag, Esq. for additional information. Use of this information is allowed, provided that credit is given to: Susan S. Waag, attorney; Waag and Co.; September 2001 Employer Bulletin; INFO@WaagandCo.com; (805) 783-2300

You can download the current and past Bulletins in PDF (Portable Document File) format where proceeded by below. All other Bulletins are in standard HTML format. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is required to open, view, and print the bulletins, you can download the application FREE from the link below.
December 2004: Government Rescinds Emergency Meal Regulation Changes
December 2004: Major Changes in Meal / Rest Break Regulations
August 2004: California’s Infamous “Bounty Hunter” Law Reformed
June 2002: Workers' Comp. Relief for Employers
April 2002: Supreme Court Favors Employers in FMLA Ruling
April 2002: Salary Basis Issue Finally Resolved
November 2001: New California Legislation (update)
November 2001: (2 Court Cases) What is Harassment?
October 2001: New Drug & Alcohol Testing Rules
October 2001: Tax Legislation: New Pension Laws
October 2001: Employers Must Explain Family Leave
March 2001: Rest and Meal Periods II
March 2001: Salary Basis Test Changes to Monthly
January 2001: AB 2509 (Wage & Hour Law)
December 2000: Rest and Meal Periods
Dec. 2000: New Calif. IWC Wage Order 16
Dec. 2000: New OSHA Ergonomics Standards
Nov. 2000: New Workplace Investigations Course
November 2000: Calif. Minimum Wage Increase
March 2000: AB60 Update
August 1999: Sick Pay Law
August 1999: Cal Poly Class and GMS
August 1999: Age Discrimination Law
November 1998: Susan Waag CCPA
November 1998: FEHA Liability Reduction
November 1998: Disability Discrimination
November 1998: COBRA
November 1998: CHP Drug Testing
July 1998: Sexual Harassment


Top | Home | About Us | Services | News | Calendar | Links | Disclaimer| Contact Us

WAAG AND CO. • Phone (805) 783-2300 • Toll Free (888) 650-WAAG • Fax (805) 544-4215
P.O. Box 5060, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 • info@waagandco.com