About Us
Services & Training
News & Updates
Calendar
Links
Our Disclaimer
Contact Us

(March 2000)
Wage & Hour: Overtime Law Update
Effective Date
March 1, 2000
Applies to
All employers
Synopsis
The new overtime law went into effect on January 1, 2000 without any new regulations to guide employers. Now, an “Interim Wage Order” has been issued, providing more information for complying with the new overtime laws. In addition to clarifying certain matters, new deadlines are included that every employer should note. More changes are expected during this year.
Discussion
The California Industrial Welfare Commission has finalized its Interim Wage Order, providing additional information for complying with the new overtime requirements that went into effect on January 1, 2000 pursuant to AB 60. The Order is effective as of March 1, 2000 and must be posted at every workplace. (Employers covered by Wage Order 14 covering Agricultural Occupations must post only Section 10 of the Interim Wage Order.) The Interim Wage Order is intended to supplement and modify your current Wage Order, so you must post the two of them next to each other. The Interim Wage Order is available either at the Industrial Welfare Commission’s web site: www.dir.ca.gov/IWC or by mail from the IWC.

The Interim Wage Order clarifies many points regarding alternate workweeks. An individual employee who was voluntarily working an alternative workweek of not more than 10 hours per day since before July 1, 1999 under Wage Orders 1, 4, 5, 7 or 9 may continue to do so after January 1, 2000 if the employee voluntarily requested to do so. Such an employee must make this request in writing and the employer must approve it in writing no later than May 30, 2000 for the individual’s schedule to be legal. Any time worked in excess of 8 hours per day prior to this written approval must be paid at overtime rates. The employee can revoke the alternate schedule with 30 days’ written notice to the employer.

Alternate schedules adopted by a majority vote of affected employees will be very difficult to implement properly. An employer must provide employees with the exact schedules being voted on; simply offering 4 days a week, 10 hours per day is not sufficient. This may make it difficult if the employer needs to cover a number of shifts per week. The employees would need to be provided with a menu of specific options, each of which is subject to group approval. If an employer does not have enough votes to cover a particular shift, the employer cannot require employees to work that shift. An employee cannot be moved to another schedule unless the employee requests to be moved. If an alternate schedule is adopted and the employer needs to accommodate an employee who cannot work it, the employer’s accommodation cannot require the employee to work more than 8 hours in a single day. This means that an employee who needs to shave 1 hour off a 10-hour workday must lose 2 hours instead. Also, if you have an alternate work schedule, but require an employee to work reduced hours on a particular day, you must pay overtime for any time worked in excess of 8 hours on that day.

A non-exempt employee who will need time off for personal obligations may request to make up the time during the same workweek. The Interim Wage Order would permit the employee to make a single written request for making up time on multiple days; however, such a request cannot be made more than 4 weeks in advance. There is no stated limit on how far ahead an employee may request make-up time for a single event. Remember that the employee cannot work more than 11 hours in one day in order to make up the time, and the employer cannot solicit or encourage such requests. There is no obligation for employers to allow this option or to approve such requests.
What This Means
The idea of an alternate schedule approved by an employee vote may sound simple and appealing, but the reality of the rules make it attractive for only a narrow number of situations. For the right operation, the alternate schedule can be a great tool. This works best for a business that can establish a simple, single alternate schedule that will not need to fluctuate (such as having business hours limited to 4 days per week, 10 work-hours per day). Employees who know they have a weekday available for appointments and errands tend to miss less work time and may be less stressed at work. Three-day weekends also can attract and retain valuable people.

However, employers who have complex operations or need more flexibility in their work schedules may find that alternate workweeks will not provide any savings or benefits. For most, simply paying overtime after 8 hours per day may be the most cost effective approach. Given the strict nature of the rules, any employer considering an alternate schedule should obtain qualified legal advice before taking any steps. See the August 1999 and February 2000 issues of The Strategic Employer for more information.

This bulletin is a general overview of the subject matter, and is not meant to provide professional opinions regarding any specific case, matter, or set of facts, or to substitute for the professional advice of Waag and Co. Instead, please contact Susan S. Waag, Esq. for additional information.
You can download the current and past Bulletins in PDF (Portable Document File) format where proceeded by below. All other Bulletins are in standard HTML format. If you do not have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is required to open, view, and print the bulletins, you can download the application FREE from the link below.
December 2004: Government Rescinds Emergency Meal Regulation Changes
December 2004: Major Changes in Meal / Rest Break Regulations
August 2004: California’s Infamous “Bounty Hunter” Law Reformed
June 2002: Workers' Comp. Relief for Employers
April 2002: Supreme Court Favors Employers in FMLA Ruling
April 2002: Salary Basis Issue Finally Resolved
November 2001: New California Legislation (update)
November 2001: (2 Court Cases) What is Harassment?
October 2001: New Drug & Alcohol Testing Rules
October 2001: Tax Legislation: New Pension Laws
October 2001: Employers Must Explain Family Leave
March 2001: Rest and Meal Periods II
March 2001: Salary Basis Test Changes to Monthly
January 2001: AB 2509 (Wage & Hour Law)
December 2000: Rest and Meal Periods
Dec. 2000: New Calif. IWC Wage Order 16
Dec. 2000: New OSHA Ergonomics Standards
Nov. 2000: New Workplace Investigations Course
November 2000: Calif. Minimum Wage Increase
March 2000: AB60 Update
August 1999: Sick Pay Law
August 1999: Cal Poly Class and GMS
August 1999: Age Discrimination Law
November 1998: Susan Waag CCPA
November 1998: FEHA Liability Reduction
November 1998: Disability Discrimination
November 1998: COBRA
November 1998: CHP Drug Testing
July 1998: Sexual Harassment


Top | Home | About Us | Services | News | Calendar | Links | Disclaimer| Contact Us

WAAG AND CO. • Phone (805) 783-2300 • Toll Free (888) 650-WAAG • Fax (805) 544-4215
P.O. Box 5060, San Luis Obispo, CA 93403 • info@waagandco.com